<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Video: Microsoft Vista Speech Recognition Tested &#8211; Perl Scripting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ibloggedthis.com/2007/02/14/video-microsoft-vista-speech-recognition-tested-perl-scripting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ibloggedthis.com/2007/02/14/video-microsoft-vista-speech-recognition-tested-perl-scripting/</link>
	<description>[Technology, Reviews, Programming, Gaming, Movies, TV, Videos, Links, etc]</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 04:44:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Niklaus</title>
		<link>http://ibloggedthis.com/2007/02/14/video-microsoft-vista-speech-recognition-tested-perl-scripting/comment-page-1/#comment-17106</link>
		<dc:creator>Niklaus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ibloggedthis.com/2007/02/14/video-microsoft-vista-speech-recognition-tested-perl-scripting/#comment-17106</guid>
		<description>This kind-of reminds me of the early Microsoft pen services for windows. Most people would get so frustrated trying to train the beast that they would opt for the little on-screen keyboard. I had an Itronix with a touch-screen and soon realized that the moer frustrated you got, the more difficult it was to write in a way that the limited recognition software could handle. 

The speech recognition appears to have the same problem. My guess is that the speech recognition simply filters the recorded speech through a fft algorithm and then tries to identify a sequence of phoneme patterns in the result that it uses as an index into a dictionary.

Most of the serious speech recognition systems require training, a short procedure involving reading a list of words as they are displayed on the screen.

  The real problem here is that speech recognition has been under development for over 30 years and there have been products that worked quite well. If you had seen any of those applications in use, you wouldn&#039;t call anything about this &quot;impressive&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This kind-of reminds me of the early Microsoft pen services for windows. Most people would get so frustrated trying to train the beast that they would opt for the little on-screen keyboard. I had an Itronix with a touch-screen and soon realized that the moer frustrated you got, the more difficult it was to write in a way that the limited recognition software could handle. </p>
<p>The speech recognition appears to have the same problem. My guess is that the speech recognition simply filters the recorded speech through a fft algorithm and then tries to identify a sequence of phoneme patterns in the result that it uses as an index into a dictionary.</p>
<p>Most of the serious speech recognition systems require training, a short procedure involving reading a list of words as they are displayed on the screen.</p>
<p>  The real problem here is that speech recognition has been under development for over 30 years and there have been products that worked quite well. If you had seen any of those applications in use, you wouldn&#8217;t call anything about this &#8220;impressive&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gvb</title>
		<link>http://ibloggedthis.com/2007/02/14/video-microsoft-vista-speech-recognition-tested-perl-scripting/comment-page-1/#comment-16644</link>
		<dc:creator>gvb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 20:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ibloggedthis.com/2007/02/14/video-microsoft-vista-speech-recognition-tested-perl-scripting/#comment-16644</guid>
		<description>Really, the voice recognition isn&#039;t that bad. He always says &#039;slektal&#039; and the computer usually knows that he means &#039;select all,&#039; which is pretty impressive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really, the voice recognition isn&#8217;t that bad. He always says &#8217;slektal&#8217; and the computer usually knows that he means &#8217;select all,&#8217; which is pretty impressive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neveryoumind</title>
		<link>http://ibloggedthis.com/2007/02/14/video-microsoft-vista-speech-recognition-tested-perl-scripting/comment-page-1/#comment-15688</link>
		<dc:creator>neveryoumind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 05:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ibloggedthis.com/2007/02/14/video-microsoft-vista-speech-recognition-tested-perl-scripting/#comment-15688</guid>
		<description>Fair enough as a piece of comedy but as a means of dissing vista speech recognition ? if you actually wanted to code why not use your hands...?or were you too busy rumbbing them together with glee at how smart your gonna look</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough as a piece of comedy but as a means of dissing vista speech recognition ? if you actually wanted to code why not use your hands&#8230;?or were you too busy rumbbing them together with glee at how smart your gonna look</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VistaHater</title>
		<link>http://ibloggedthis.com/2007/02/14/video-microsoft-vista-speech-recognition-tested-perl-scripting/comment-page-1/#comment-15664</link>
		<dc:creator>VistaHater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 01:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ibloggedthis.com/2007/02/14/video-microsoft-vista-speech-recognition-tested-perl-scripting/#comment-15664</guid>
		<description>The person dictating is STUPID.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The person dictating is STUPID.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

